[CRISP-TEAM] [Reminder: Comment on SLA close today 2nd June ] Re: Call for comments from the CRISP Team Re: first draft review of the SLA v1.0

[Janvier Noulaye]

2015-06-03 10:03 GMT+01:00 Andrei Robachevsky <robachevsky at isoc.org>:

> Hi,
> Izumi Okutani wrote on 03/06/15 10:54:
> > Yes, I think I am confused about the same part.
>
> Since this part s confusing, a better approach may be to clearly state
> our expectation in the analysis, rather than guessing what the precise
> meaning of 12.1.1. could be.
>

​Maybe Craig could also more elaborate his statement to clear up the
confusion?​

​/Janvier​


> How about:
>
> This principle is adequately addressed in Article 12. In our
> understanding this provision covers potential IPRs and trademarks,
> excluding the IANA trademark, IANA.ORG and the public registry data. In
> our understanding the expected arrangements for these assets will have
> happened (i.e. transferred to the IETF Trust and declared as being in
> the public domain) before the SLA is signed, and therefore are outside
> the scope of this Agreement.
>
> We also note that such arrangements will need to be documented and
> implemented in other agreements between all of the relevant actors
> (which include more than the parties to this SLA).
>
> Andrei
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150603/bedbd2f0/attachment.html>