[CRISP-TEAM] Draft Notes CRISP 12 Teleconference (Jan 13)

[Izumi Okutani]

Dear Maria,


Thank you for the notes for CRISP 12 Teleconference.

I thought this captures the discussions very well and it must have taken 
some time to compile them all, considering its length. Thank you.

I just have four minor comments.

>
> 4. Editorial suggestions
> a. Confirm status
> MA: Quick status update: AB did a good job of incorporating the comments. I took the ones I’d made as well as the list of items provided by AR, Pindar, NN, Niall, Paul Wilson. After, Bill Woodcock incorporated some comments to clean up the draft a little bit. You’ve probably seen email traffic during the last hour. AB has done a good job. If anybody has specific questions about any specific changes, please let me know.
>
> AB: I want to mention that in the edits I submitted to MA I didn’t include some of the changes I’d talked about on the mailing list, specifically changing “NRO” to “RIRs,”as I thought this was a substantial change, not an editorial change.
>
> b. Paul Wilson's suggested changes
> ???

(instead of ???)
It was been discussed under the following agenda items:

"4. c. Timeline to work" and
"7. Timeline and how we work for the final submission a. Schedule".


>
> 5. Confirm status of editorial suggestions
(snip)

>
> c. Contract Fee
> IO: I want to discuss this when AR is here. I sent a text suggestion and he shared a simplified version about how the contract fee should be based on cost recovery. I just want to double check that the contract fee should be decided between the IANA operator and the RIRs or if it’s obvious and doesn’t need to be included. Comments? Does anybody feel that it is important to explicitly state that this is a decision to be made between the operator and the RIRs?
>
> PR (via chat): I like the way Andrei stated it.
>
> AB and JS also agreed (via chat).

Conclusion: Reflect Andrei's text in Section IIIA3xi


> 6. CRISP Team positions per issue
> IO: I’m not seeing any new substantive issues, but I’d like to quickly confirm our general position.

IO: I'm not seeing any new substantive issues for comments posted on 
IANAXFER list, but I'd like to quickly confirm our general position.


(snip)

(add 6.e as below)

e. Summary of the issues discussed

>
> I’d like to confirm that, except for 6b which might require some text changes, nothing else requires changes.
>
> IO asked for volunteers to help her work on updating the issues list. As nobody volunteered, she said they would take it to the mailing list.
>


Izumi

On 2015/01/29 10:31, Izumi Okutani wrote:
> CRISP Team,
>
>
> I am attaching the notes of the 12th CRISP Team teleconference on behalf
> of the NRO secretariat team.
>
> (There seems to be some issues in posting to the CRISP Team mailing list
> from the NRO secretariat team).
>
>
> Please comment within the next 24 hours if you wish to make any changes.
> I will do this myself as well.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Izumi
>