[CRISP-TEAM] [NRO secretariat] To NRO secretariat

[Izumi Okutani]

Hi Martin,


No problem and the request to the NRO secretariat probably wasn't very
obvisous with so many e-mails.

Thanks for working on it.


Regards,
Izumi

On 2015/01/28 23:40, Martin wrote:
> Hi Izumi.
> Sorry for the late response. I will try to finish the listed items before
> tomorrow, I'll let you know.
> Regards,
> Martin.
> 
> El 28/1/15 a las 10:01, Izumi Okutani escribi��:
>> German and the NRO secretariat team,
>>
>>
>> Thank you for the support you have provided us towards submission of the
>> proposal to the ICG and hope you managed to take some rest.
>>
>> Just to follow up on a few actions, would you help us complete the
>> following items listed below?
>>
>> I would like to complete them before ICANN52 Singapore meeting.
>>
>> For 7, please refer to "Request for NRO CRISP Team Update" thread.
>> Attached is the latest issues list (which reflects comment from Jim Reid).
>>
>>   https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/2015-January/001323.html
>>
>> I wish to have this issues list posted with high priority, so the ICG
>> can review how we have addressed comment for the second draft.
>>
>> Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions about any of
>> the actions.
>>
>>
>>> 5. Notes of CRISP Teleconferences
>>>      - We need to post notes from 9th, 12th, 13th and 14th meetings
>>>
>>>       Would NRO secretariat share us the progress?
>>>       (Please also remind me if I missed to check any of the notes which
>>>       has been circulated)
>>>
>>> 6. Post html and text versions
>>>      - Re-attached are html and text versions to be posted on the NRO
>>>        CRISP Team website
>>>
>>>
>>> 7. NRO CRISP Team website
>>>       Since we have already submitted the proposal, I observe two
>>>       changes are needed to reflect this.
>>>
>>>       I will create a seperate thread to hear comments from CRISP Team
>>>       members.
>>
>> Many thanks as always,
>> Izumi
>>
>>
>> On 2015/01/21 13:59, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>>> CRISP Team,
>>>
>>>
>>> There are a couple of work items I would like to follow up after the
>>> submission of our proposal to the ICG.
>>>
>>> This is just listing work items which we still to work on, and no need
>>> to have your responses unless there is anything you would like to
>>> comment in particular.
>>>
>>>
>>> For 1.,4. and 7 I will create a seperate thread to consult the CRISP Team.
>>>
>>> 5.and 6 are related to the NRO secretariat (and 7 also once fixed).
>>> I assume they are under work and would be helpful to hear a rough target
>>> of completion.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. Comment from Richard Hill at"Icg-Forum at Icann.Org"
>>>      Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:08:31 +0100
>>>
>>>      http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00020.html
>>>
>>>      Paul Wilson, one of the ICG members brought this to my attention.
>>>      Richard Hill is repeating the same arguement as in the IANAXFER.
>>>
>>>      Note"Icg-Forum at Icann.Org"  is not a proper channel to submit
>>>      comments and not a part of the formal process. I will create a
>>>      seperate thread on this.
>>>
>>> 2. Issue status list
>>>      I will update the list and share today.
>>>
>>> 3. Presentation at ICANN52
>>>      There will be a session at ICANN52 to share reponses to the ICG RFP.
>>>      The ICG is planning to invite presentation from the Numbers
>>>      community at the session - more details to be shared from the ICG
>>>      once confirmed.
>>>
>>>      Responses to the ICG RFP regarding the IANA Stewardship Transition
>>>      Monday, 9 February (1015 - 1300)
>>>      http://singapore52.icann.org/en/schedule-full#09feb15
>>>
>>>      I will share with the CRISP Team once I confirm details.
>>>
>>> 4. Communicate to the IANAXFER about next steps?
>>>      We updated the IANAXFER list about our submission to the ICG and our
>>>      update stops there.
>>>
>>>      I feel we should share what the next steps are, especially the next
>>>      point the community is exected to give feedback on the integrated
>>>      proposal, the session at ICANN52 and how the CRISP Team will be/will
>>>      not be involved in future steps.
>>>
>>>      I don't know if this is better from the CRISP Team to do this or the
>>>      ICG members to do it but let's confirm about this point as well. I
>>>      will create a seperate thread.
>>>
>>> 5. Notes of CRISP Teleconferences
>>>      - We need to post notes from 9th, 12th, 13th and 14th meetings
>>>
>>>       Would NRO secretariat share us the progress?
>>>       (Please also remind me if I missed to check any of the notes which
>>>       has been circulated)
>>>
>>> 6. Post html and text versions
>>>      - Re-attached are html and text versions to be posted on the NRO
>>>        CRISP Team website
>>>
>>>
>>> 7. NRO CRISP Team website
>>>       Since we have already submitted the proposal, I observe two
>>>       changes are needed to reflect this.
>>>
>>>       I will create a seperate thread to hear comments from CRISP Team
>>>       members.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Izumi
>>>
> 
> -- 
> Embedded Image
> *Mart��n Ma��ana*
> Webmaster
> ������& Designer
> *# 4204*
> Embedded Image
> *Casa de Internet de
> Latinoam��rica y el Caribe*
> Rambla Rep. de M��xico 6125
> 11400 Montevideo-Uruguay
> +598 2604 22 22��www.lacnic.net <http://www.lacnic.net>
>