[CRISP-TEAM] Update from the ICG

Wed Jan 28 15:05:44 CET 2015

Thanks Craig. That was useful.

So it seems likely that we should prepare a response for comment(s) to
icg-forum, while we should still wait for formal guidance from the ICG.

Izumi

On 2015/01/28 22:27, Craig Ng wrote:
> I'm listening in on the ICG call #11 now, and they are discussing how to
> deal with this ���
> 
> If you are interested in hopping onto the call, you can do so here for the
> next hour: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/icg
> 
> 
> Craig
> 
> 
> 
> On 29/01/2015 12:19 am, "Sweeting, John" <john.sweeting at twcable.com> wrote:
> 
>> I agree. A gentle nudge is good since we have not received the guidance that
>> they said was coming.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jan 28, 2015, at 7:57 AM, Mwendwa Kivuva <Kivuva at transworldafrica.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am also comfortable with that approach.
>>>
>>> ______________________
>>> Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
>>>
>>> "There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on
>>> higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28 January 2015 at 15:12, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>>>> Thank you Andrei for your comment.
>>>>
>>>> If no comments for other suggesions until UTC 13:00 tomorrow 29th Jan, what
>>>> I plan to do is to contact Alex as the chair of NRO, Paul Wilson and Adiel
>>>> as the ICG members from NRO and follow up for their guidance on the CRISP
>>>> Team's role (if any) in future steps of the Timeline.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Izumi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2015/01/28 17:17, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>>>> HI,
>>>>>
>>>>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 28/01/15 02:45:
>>>>>> Thank you for sharing Patrik's presentation Nurani.
>>>>>> It gives us comprehensive picture of where we are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good question Andrei and this was something I wanted to clarify as well.
>>>>>> It was initially my understanding that we are waiting for guidance from
>>>>>> NRO EC about this.
>>>>>> (Based on "Communicate to the IANAXFER about next steps?" thread)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would be happy to ask for clarification to the ICG if appropriate -
>>>>>> One point I'd like to confirm is whether it is the ICG as the whole
>>>>>> group which is in the position to clarify, or whether this is left to
>>>>>> the numbers commmunity as in the proposal submission.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My current understanding is the latter and I'm happy to be corrected if
>>>>>> I misunderstand. If this understanding is consistent with others in the
>>>>>> CRISP Team, my suggestion for the next step would be:
>>>>>
>>>>> My understanding is also that it is left to the community, not the ICG,
>>>>> to define the processes (beyond the requirements of openness,
>>>>> transparency and inclusiveness).
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - First confirm with NRO EC, which has set up the charter of the
>>>>>>      CRISP Team, with cc to ICG members representing NRO (Paul & Adiel).
>>>>>>    - If the NRO EC/ICG members from NRO think this is a matter to be
>>>>>>      confirmed with the ICG, we can confirm this to the ICG.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think about this understanding and approach?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This approach makes sense to me. Thank you Izumi.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Izumi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2015/01/27 23:51, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nurani Nimpuno wrote on 27/01/15 15:37:
>>>>>>>> Hi Andrei,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks. This is a good question and it is not entirely clear to me
>>>>>>>> either.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But perhaps any such matters need to be clarified through the proper
>>>>>>>> channels. It was certainly not my intention to bypass any official
>>>>>>>> communication between the ICG and CRISP via the chairs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe we should try to identify if there are other aspects of the
>>>>>>>> process that we need to seek clarification on and if so, do this
>>>>>>>> through the CRISP chairs?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IMO, this is a good suggestion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nurani
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 27 jan 2015, at 15:06, Andrei Robachevsky <robachevsky at isoc.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Nurani,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you for this. This is an excellent overview.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One aspect is not clear to me: what would be the process of the
>>>>>>>> (numbers) community review of the ICG strawman proposal (and the final
>>>>>>>> version, too), and is it expected that the CRISP team will play any
>>>>>>>> role
>>>>>>>> there?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nurani Nimpuno wrote on 27/01/15 14:12:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My colleague Patrik F���������ltstr���������m (co-chair of the ICG), just gave the
>>>>>>>> following update on the IANA Stewardship Transition from the ICG,
>>>>>>>> at an igov-meeting I was in.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I asked him if I could forward it to my CRISP colleagues which he
>>>>>>>> approved of. :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nurani
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>>>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>>>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>>>>>> <https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>>>>> <https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>>>> <https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>> <https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CRISP mailing list
>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>>
>> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
>> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
>> copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for
>> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not
>> the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any
>> dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the
>> contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be
>> unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender
>> immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail
>> and any printout.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> 