[CRISP-TEAM] Update from the ICG

Craig Ng craig at apnic.net
Wed Jan 28 14:27:14 CET 2015 

I'm listening in on the ICG call #11 now, and they are discussing how to
deal with this …

If you are interested in hopping onto the call, you can do so here for the
next hour: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/icg


Craig



On 29/01/2015 12:19 am, "Sweeting, John" <john.sweeting at twcable.com> wrote:

> I agree. A gentle nudge is good since we have not received the guidance that
> they said was coming.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jan 28, 2015, at 7:57 AM, Mwendwa Kivuva <Kivuva at transworldafrica.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> I am also comfortable with that approach.
>> 
>> ______________________
>> Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
>> 
>> "There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on
>> higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson
>> 
>> 
>> On 28 January 2015 at 15:12, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>>> Thank you Andrei for your comment.
>>> 
>>> If no comments for other suggesions until UTC 13:00 tomorrow 29th Jan, what
>>> I plan to do is to contact Alex as the chair of NRO, Paul Wilson and Adiel
>>> as the ICG members from NRO and follow up for their guidance on the CRISP
>>> Team's role (if any) in future steps of the Timeline.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Izumi 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 2015/01/28 17:17, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>>> HI,
>>>> 
>>>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 28/01/15 02:45:
>>>>> Thank you for sharing Patrik's presentation Nurani.
>>>>> It gives us comprehensive picture of where we are.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Good question Andrei and this was something I wanted to clarify as well.
>>>>> It was initially my understanding that we are waiting for guidance from
>>>>> NRO EC about this.
>>>>> (Based on "Communicate to the IANAXFER about next steps?" thread)
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would be happy to ask for clarification to the ICG if appropriate -
>>>>> One point I'd like to confirm is whether it is the ICG as the whole
>>>>> group which is in the position to clarify, or whether this is left to
>>>>> the numbers commmunity as in the proposal submission.
>>>>> 
>>>>> My current understanding is the latter and I'm happy to be corrected if
>>>>> I misunderstand. If this understanding is consistent with others in the
>>>>> CRISP Team, my suggestion for the next step would be:
>>>> 
>>>> My understanding is also that it is left to the community, not the ICG,
>>>> to define the processes (beyond the requirements of openness,
>>>> transparency and inclusiveness).
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   - First confirm with NRO EC, which has set up the charter of the
>>>>>     CRISP Team, with cc to ICG members representing NRO (Paul & Adiel).
>>>>>   - If the NRO EC/ICG members from NRO think this is a matter to be
>>>>>     confirmed with the ICG, we can confirm this to the ICG.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What do you think about this understanding and approach?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> This approach makes sense to me. Thank you Izumi.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Andrei
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Izumi
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2015/01/27 23:51, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Nurani Nimpuno wrote on 27/01/15 15:37:
>>>>>>> Hi Andrei,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks. This is a good question and it is not entirely clear to me
>>>>>>> either.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But perhaps any such matters need to be clarified through the proper
>>>>>>> channels. It was certainly not my intention to bypass any official
>>>>>>> communication between the ICG and CRISP via the chairs.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Maybe we should try to identify if there are other aspects of the
>>>>>>> process that we need to seek clarification on and if so, do this
>>>>>>> through the CRISP chairs?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> IMO, this is a good suggestion.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Nurani
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 27 jan 2015, at 15:06, Andrei Robachevsky <robachevsky at isoc.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Nurani,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thank you for this. This is an excellent overview.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> One aspect is not clear to me: what would be the process of the
>>>>>>> (numbers) community review of the ICG strawman proposal (and the final
>>>>>>> version, too), and is it expected that the CRISP team will play any
>>>>>>> role
>>>>>>> there?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Nurani Nimpuno wrote on 27/01/15 14:12:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> My colleague Patrik F���ltstr���m (co-chair of the ICG), just gave the
>>>>>>> following update on the IANA Stewardship Transition from the ICG,
>>>>>>> at an igov-meeting I was in.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I asked him if I could forward it to my CRISP colleagues which he
>>>>>>> approved of. :)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Nurani
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>>>>> <https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>>>> <https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp>
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>>> <https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CRISP mailing list
>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>> <https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> 
> 
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
> copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for
> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not
> the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the
> contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender
> immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail
> and any printout.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150128/dee8b6c3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3565 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150128/dee8b6c3/smime.p7s>

More information about the CRISP mailing list