[CRISP-TEAM] Update from the ICG

Wed Jan 28 14:19:47 CET 2015

I agree. A gentle nudge is good since we have not received the guidance that they said was coming.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 28, 2015, at 7:57 AM, Mwendwa Kivuva <Kivuva at transworldafrica.com<mailto:Kivuva at transworldafrica.com>> wrote:

I am also comfortable with that approach.

______________________
Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya

"There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson

On 28 January 2015 at 15:12, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp<mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp>> wrote:
Thank you Andrei for your comment.

If no comments for other suggesions until UTC 13:00 tomorrow 29th Jan, what I plan to do is to contact Alex as the chair of NRO, Paul Wilson and Adiel as the ICG members from NRO and follow up for their guidance on the CRISP Team's role (if any) in future steps of the Timeline.

Regards,
Izumi

On 2015/01/28 17:17, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
HI,

Izumi Okutani wrote on 28/01/15 02:45:
Thank you for sharing Patrik's presentation Nurani.
It gives us comprehensive picture of where we are.

Good question Andrei and this was something I wanted to clarify as well.
It was initially my understanding that we are waiting for guidance from
NRO EC about this.
(Based on "Communicate to the IANAXFER about next steps?" thread)

I would be happy to ask for clarification to the ICG if appropriate -
One point I'd like to confirm is whether it is the ICG as the whole
group which is in the position to clarify, or whether this is left to
the numbers commmunity as in the proposal submission.

My current understanding is the latter and I'm happy to be corrected if
I misunderstand. If this understanding is consistent with others in the
CRISP Team, my suggestion for the next step would be:

My understanding is also that it is left to the community, not the ICG,
to define the processes (beyond the requirements of openness,
transparency and inclusiveness).

  - First confirm with NRO EC, which has set up the charter of the
    CRISP Team, with cc to ICG members representing NRO (Paul & Adiel).
  - If the NRO EC/ICG members from NRO think this is a matter to be
    confirmed with the ICG, we can confirm this to the ICG.

What do you think about this understanding and approach?

This approach makes sense to me. Thank you Izumi.

Regards,

Andrei

Izumi

On 2015/01/27 23:51, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:

Nurani Nimpuno wrote on 27/01/15 15:37:
Hi Andrei,

Thanks. This is a good question and it is not entirely clear to me
either.

But perhaps any such matters need to be clarified through the proper
channels. It was certainly not my intention to bypass any official
communication between the ICG and CRISP via the chairs.

Maybe we should try to identify if there are other aspects of the
process that we need to seek clarification on and if so, do this
through the CRISP chairs?

IMO, this is a good suggestion.

Andrei

Nurani

On 27 jan 2015, at 15:06, Andrei Robachevsky <robachevsky at isoc.org<mailto:robachevsky at isoc.org>>
wrote:

Hi Nurani,

Thank you for this. This is an excellent overview.

One aspect is not clear to me: what would be the process of the
(numbers) community review of the ICG strawman proposal (and the final
version, too), and is it expected that the CRISP team will play any
role
there?

Andrei

Nurani Nimpuno wrote on 27/01/15 14:12:
Hi,

My colleague Patrik F���ltstr���m (co-chair of the ICG), just gave the
following update on the IANA Stewardship Transition from the ICG,
at an igov-meeting I was in.

I asked him if I could forward it to my CRISP colleagues which he
approved of. :)

Kind regards,

Nurani

_______________________________________________
CRISP mailing list
CRISP at nro.net<mailto:CRISP at nro.net>
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp

_______________________________________________
CRISP mailing list
CRISP at nro.net<mailto:CRISP at nro.net>
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp

_______________________________________________
CRISP mailing list
CRISP at nro.net<mailto:CRISP at nro.net>
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp

_______________________________________________
CRISP mailing list
CRISP at nro.net<mailto:CRISP at nro.net>
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp

_______________________________________________
CRISP mailing list
CRISP at nro.net<mailto:CRISP at nro.net>
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp

________________________________
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150128/b347c871/attachment.html>