[CRISP-TEAM] Update from the ICG

[Izumi Okutani]

Thank you for sharing Patrik's presentation Nurani.
It gives us comprehensive picture of where we are.

Good question Andrei and this was something I wanted to clarify as well. 
It was initially my understanding that we are waiting for guidance from 
NRO EC about this.
(Based on "Communicate to the IANAXFER about next steps?" thread)

I would be happy to ask for clarification to the ICG if appropriate - 
One point I'd like to confirm is whether it is the ICG as the whole 
group which is in the position to clarify, or whether this is left to 
the numbers commmunity as in the proposal submission.

My current understanding is the latter and I'm happy to be corrected if 
I misunderstand. If this understanding is consistent with others in the 
CRISP Team, my suggestion for the next step would be:

  - First confirm with NRO EC, which has set up the charter of the
    CRISP Team, with cc to ICG members representing NRO (Paul & Adiel).
  - If the NRO EC/ICG members from NRO think this is a matter to be
    confirmed with the ICG, we can confirm this to the ICG.

What do you think about this understanding and approach?



Izumi

On 2015/01/27 23:51, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>
>
> Nurani Nimpuno wrote on 27/01/15 15:37:
>> Hi Andrei,
>>
>> Thanks. This is a good question and it is not entirely clear to me either.
>>
>> But perhaps any such matters need to be clarified through the proper channels. It was certainly not my intention to bypass any official communication between the ICG and CRISP via the chairs.
>>
>> Maybe we should try to identify if there are other aspects of the process that we need to seek clarification on and if so, do this through the CRISP chairs?
>>
>
> IMO, this is a good suggestion.
>
> Andrei
>
>> Nurani
>>
>>
>> On 27 jan 2015, at 15:06, Andrei Robachevsky <robachevsky at isoc.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Nurani,
>>>
>>> Thank you for this. This is an excellent overview.
>>>
>>> One aspect is not clear to me: what would be the process of the
>>> (numbers) community review of the ICG strawman proposal (and the final
>>> version, too), and is it expected that the CRISP team will play any role
>>> there?
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>>
>>> Nurani Nimpuno wrote on 27/01/15 14:12:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> My colleague Patrik F�ltstr�m (co-chair of the ICG), just gave the following update on the IANA Stewardship Transition from the ICG, at an igov-meeting I was in.
>>>>
>>>> I asked him if I could forward it to my CRISP colleagues which he approved of. :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> Nurani
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>