[CRISP-TEAM] Update from the ICG

[Nurani Nimpuno]

Hi Andrei,

Thanks. This is a good question and it is not entirely clear to me either.

But perhaps any such matters need to be clarified through the proper channels. It was certainly not my intention to bypass any official communication between the ICG and CRISP via the chairs. 

Maybe we should try to identify if there are other aspects of the process that we need to seek clarification on and if so, do this through the CRISP chairs?

Nurani


On 27 jan 2015, at 15:06, Andrei Robachevsky <robachevsky at isoc.org> wrote:

> Hi Nurani,
> 
> Thank you for this. This is an excellent overview.
> 
> One aspect is not clear to me: what would be the process of the
> (numbers) community review of the ICG strawman proposal (and the final
> version, too), and is it expected that the CRISP team will play any role
> there?
> 
> Andrei
> 
> Nurani Nimpuno wrote on 27/01/15 14:12:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> My colleague Patrik Fältström (co-chair of the ICG), just gave the following update on the IANA Stewardship Transition from the ICG, at an igov-meeting I was in. 
>> 
>> I asked him if I could forward it to my CRISP colleagues which he approved of. :)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> Nurani
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp