[CRISP-TEAM] Future steps and communicating with RIRs

[Izumi Okutani]

Great Andrei, so I just sent a draft response to the IANAXFER list about
the future steps.

https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/2015-January/001353.html

Indeed, Step2 does not seem to be the only part changed and I seem some
changes in steps itself in the updated timeline.

Izumi

On 2015/01/24 1:48, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
> Hi Izumi,
> 
> Izumi Okutani wrote on 23/01/15 17:15:
>> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/iana-transition-assembly-finalization-24dec14-en.pdf
>>   - I'm not sure if there is a seperate step equivalent for this in the
>>     latest timeline
>>
>> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/icg-process-timeline-07jan15-en.pdf
>>
>> Assuming there is no seperate step for "accepting" under the latest
>> timeline, I'm personally OK to do communicate with RIRs after Step2 of
>> 7th Jan 2015 version of the timeline as:
> 
> I wasn't aware of that, thank you! Sigh, it is not only the milestone
> shifted, the phases are not the same.
> 
> But I think your suggestion makes sense - by 13 March we should be able
> to confidently communicate that the substantive elements are accepted.
> 
>>
>>   - RIRs would be proceeding with the preparation as needed before this
>>     anyways, and
>>   - We will be communicating on the IANAXFER list now about our plan
>>     for the next steps, so we won't be keeping the community in suspense
>>     about future steps until March
>>   - Informing the RIRs of the proposal to the CRISP team is  more for
>>     making the protocol visible for the community so they can confirm
>>     things are proceeding towards implementation, as the ICG's
>>     considerations for the proposals move to further steps.
>>
>> I'll tentatively draft an e-mail reponse to Seun based on this thinking,
>> but I do continue to welcome feedback/clarifications from the CRISP Tem
>> members if any.
> 
> Thank you, this is clear to me.
> 
> Andrei
>