[CRISP-TEAM] Future steps and communicating with RIRs

[Andrei Robachevsky]

Hi,

May I ask to clarify something?

Izumi Okutani wrote on 23/01/15 11:00:
[...]
>> I want to understand it clearly,
>> 1. ICG acknowledges receipt of CRISP proposal
> 
> 2. CRISP Team formally informs the executives of the RIRs about the
> proposal.

Izumi, you suggested before that "We communicate with RIR *after* the
ICG formally accepts the proposal". IMO, this is different from
acknowledging the receipt of the proposal.

Accepting the proposal means (according to the ICG document) that they
have reviewed the following:
1. Any process concerns that were highlighted to the ICG by participants
in the proposal development process.
2. Whether input/comments the ICG received directly were shared with
the operational community and were considered or addressed by the
operational community.
3. Whether the proposal obtained consensus (as defined in that
community’s process) among those who participated in the operational
community process.

So, this sounds more like item 3 in Mwendwa's plan.

And in my opinion this is already an early heads up, since the combined
proposal that is going to be reviewed by NTIA may require some
clarifications or additions.

Please correct me if I misunderstand the process, or if you think this
is not significant enough.

Andrei

> 
>> 2. RIRs acknowledge acceptance of the proposal (I have seen great
>> unofficial support from Adiel, Paul Wilson, and John Curran on our proposal)
> 
> Indeed. and as step three, we expect formal acknowledgement from RIRs
> about the proposal and they will procees with actions expected from them.
> 
>> 3. ICG accepts our proposal and gives RIRs go ahead to draft contract/SLA
>> and form Review Team
> 
> I'm not sure if the ICG is in the position to give it a go.
> My assumption was that the RIR will start preparation without waiting
> for intruction from anyone.
> 
>> 4. RIRs form Review Team and draft contract.
> 
> and consult the community where needed.
> 
>> 5. Contract is sent to ICG
> 
> In my view, it is not necessary to send the contract to the ICG.
> 
>> Are the next steps anything similar to that?
> 
> 
> So steps in my understanding is:
> 
> 1. ICG acknowledges receipt of CRISP proposal
> 
>  # It seems the timeline has changed since December so I'm not sure if
>    the ICG will have a seperate phased of expressing acceptance, before
>    sharing the compiled proposal in March.
>    Would someone be able to confirm?
> 
> 2. CRISP Team formally informs the executives of the RIRs about the
> proposal.
> 
> 3. RIRs formally acknowledge the proposal which require actions by the RIRs
> 
> 4. RIRs prepare for implementation (form Review Committee and draft SLA)
> and consult the community where needed.
> 
> 5. Preparations for implementation completed before the transtion from
> the NTIA (form Review Committee and SLA text ready for signing).
> 
> 
> I welcome feedback on any point which is different from others in the
> CRISP Team.
> 
> As mentioned in my earlier post, I'll also share a draft response to the
> IANAXFER list several hours later.
> 
> 
> Izumi
>