[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] CRISP - Process Concerns
robachevsky at isoc.org
Fri Jan 23 12:54:57 CET 2015
I support this proposal.
Izumi Okutani wrote on 23/01/15 11:03:
> On 2015/01/23 16:50, Alan Barrett wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>>> Alissa Cooper has referenced the same comment Nurani has shared with
>>> us on the CRISP Team list yesterday.
>>> I got the impression she has posted this as a reference in her
>>> personal capacity and not a formal request from the ICG for the CRISP
>>> Team to respond to this. (Correct me if I am wrong - I plan to double
>>> check with Paul Wilson as an ICG member)
>>> However, since it is now posted on the IANAXFER list, it may seem odd
>>> that we make no reactions as the CRISP Team, as this is about the
>>> CRISP Team process.
>> She made it clear in the IETF ianaplan list that she is posting such
>> comments because the ICG said that they would forward comments to the
>> appropriate operational community. See
> Helpful reference. Thank you Alan.
>>> My suggestion is, we make our status clear as below.
>>> - We are aware of the posts to the icg-forum mailing list, including
>>> the link shared by John Curran.
>>> - However, since this is the communication channel for the community
>>> to the ICG, we do not feel approporiate that we respond directly to
>>> posts on this list as the CRISP Team at this stage.
>>> - If the ICG considers the response is needed from the CRISP Team and
>>> requests us to do so, we are happy to prepare our response
>>> - We wait for guidance from the ICG, whether or not this is needed.
>>> What do you think?
>> That's fine.
> OK. I'll post a message along this line to the IANAXFER list after UTC
> 15:00 if no other comments from the CRISP Team about this.
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
More information about the CRISP