[CRISP-TEAM] Future steps and communicating with RIRs
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Fri Jan 23 10:47:53 CET 2015
On 2015/01/23 16:46, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> Since Seun Ojedeji is asking questions about the next steps, I would
>> like to suggest we reply to the IANAXFER list now, what our plan is i.e.,
>> - We communicate with RIR *after* the ICG formally accepts the proposal
>> - Clarify that this is intended for communication as reference to the
>> - The CRISP Team would like to hear acknowlegement from RIRs about
>> this proposal and that there are actions expected on their part, for
>> clarity and visibility to the community that RIRs formally
>> acknowledge this
>> If this makes sense, I am happy to draft a response, so all in the
>> team can see if you are comfortable with the message and the wording.
> That sounds fine.
Good to know. I'll send a seperate e-mail with a draft then.
(I have a plan after this, so this will be several hours later)
>> As for early preparation, I think we can expect CRISP Team members,
>> who are RIR staff to go back within their respective RIRs and start
>> preparation needed at this stage.
> I have satisfiead my belief that we should not wait before informing the
> RIRs, by informing the Afrinic Board that the proposal has been submitted.
OK. In case of the APNIC region, I would say it's sufficiently covered as:
- Paul Wilson, the Director General is very much keeping track of the
proposal as an ICG member.
- Chair of APNIC EC, Akinori Maemura is following contents of the
proposal through his observations of the IANAXFER discussions.
- Legal Council, Craig Ng is a member of the CRISP Team.
He is also communicating with relevant policy staff within APNIC.
I trust similar situation or planned to be covered in each RIR.
More information about the CRISP