[CRISP-TEAM] Some Follow up Items

Alan Barrett apb at cequrux.com
Thu Jan 22 13:23:38 CET 2015

On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
> I tend to agree with Andrei here.
> I don't find it quite appropriate for us to at this stage start 
> telling the RIRs that they need to do x, y, z.

What I proposed was subtly different.  Don't tell them that they need to
do X, Y, Z, but rell them that we have sibmitted a proposal that, if
accepted, will require them to do X, Y, Z.

> One alternative way forward, could be that we formally send 
> a brief note to the RIR CEOs. We simply point them to the 
> proposal and ask them to consider its content as it will have 
> implications for them. (No need to list what actions the RIRs 
> need to take.) We could possibly ask for them to confirm receipt 
> of this.

I'd be fine with just saying "here's the proposal we submitted, 
pleaseconsider its implications", and not saying "if accepted, 
the proposal will require the RIRs to do X, Y Z".  I would not be 
happy with waiting.

> After that, we send a note to the community, informing them that 
> we have communicated with the RIRs and they have acknowledged 
> receipt in some way and that we trust that they are following 
> the process and starting whatever internal work they need to 
> meet the needs of the community.

Yes, I agree that we should inform the community.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

More information about the CRISP mailing list