[CRISP-TEAM] Some Follow up Items
Alan Barrett
apb at cequrux.com
Thu Jan 22 13:23:38 CET 2015
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
> I tend to agree with Andrei here.
> I don't find it quite appropriate for us to at this stage start
> telling the RIRs that they need to do x, y, z.
What I proposed was subtly different. Don't tell them that they need to
do X, Y, Z, but rell them that we have sibmitted a proposal that, if
accepted, will require them to do X, Y, Z.
> One alternative way forward, could be that we formally send
> a brief note to the RIR CEOs. We simply point them to the
> proposal and ask them to consider its content as it will have
> implications for them. (No need to list what actions the RIRs
> need to take.) We could possibly ask for them to confirm receipt
> of this.
I'd be fine with just saying "here's the proposal we submitted,
pleaseconsider its implications", and not saying "if accepted,
the proposal will require the RIRs to do X, Y Z". I would not be
happy with waiting.
> After that, we send a note to the community, informing them that
> we have communicated with the RIRs and they have acknowledged
> receipt in some way and that we trust that they are following
> the process and starting whatever internal work they need to
> meet the needs of the community.
Yes, I agree that we should inform the community.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the CRISP
mailing list