[CRISP-TEAM] Some Follow up Items
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Thu Jan 22 13:10:45 CET 2015
On 2015/01/22 20:56, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> I have mixed feelings about which phase to formally request as :
>> - it's better to be early for preparation but
>> - it seems to me RIRs can proceed from now in reality as they consider
>> as needed, without waiting for the CRISP Team and
>> - don't want to appear as though we are not ready to listen to the
>> ICG/the other two communities.
> In reality, the RIRs have all noticed that we submitted a proposal to
> the ICG, and they will have read it. But as far as the formal process
> is concerned, they have not been informed of progress.
> I strongly urge informing them of what we have done, and what we think
> the implications are for them. We should also be clear that the
> proposal may be modified in the future, either by us in response to an
> ICG request, or by the ICG as part of preparing a combined proposal.
Noted Alan. If this works for everyone, I'm OK with this.
We are still waiting for guidance from the NRO EC on any possible
involvement expected from the CRISP Team in future steps, so while we
wait for that, let's give 24h window for comments on this.
If no other opinions/suggestions before UTC12:00 23rd Jan , we fix this
as our position, that we inform RIRs about their expected actions now
without waiting for later step.
Question to German or RIR staff,
Where would be an appropriate POC to do this?
(e.g. would it be NRO EC or any other contact more adequate?)
More information about the CRISP