[CRISP-TEAM] Some Follow up Items

Izumi Okutani izumi at nic.ad.jp
Thu Jan 22 12:11:27 CET 2015


On 2015/01/22 19:42, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
> Alan Barrett wrote on 22/01/15 11:17:
>>>>>> * Establish a process for selecting the Review Committee.
>>
>>> Just to clarify, based on information shared by Andrei, we inform the
>>> IANAXFER list that we plan to do this in Step III (after Step II is
>>> completed)?
>>>
>>> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/iana-transition-assembly-finalization-24dec14-en.pdf
>>>
>>>
>>> It may be premature to inform RIRs at this stage, as the ICG may make
>>> some changes after integration of the proposal with those of the other
>>> two communities (protocol parameter and names).
>>
>> No, I think we should inform the RIRs now.  We can also mention that the
>> ICG may make some changes, but I'd like to give the RIRs as much notice
>> as possible.
> 
> I was actually suggesting that we wait till Phase I is over (no later
> than 15 February, according to the timeline), since until then our work
> is not done, as I see it.  Once the CRISP proposal is formally accepted,
> it makes sense to communicate this fact, along with possible follow-up
> items (I suppose the ICG may provide their perspective in their formal
> response, too).
> 


Would this work for you Alan?
Wait until Phase I is over?

I have mixed feelings about which phase to formally request as :

 - it's better to be early for preparation but
 - it seems to me RIRs can proceed from now in reality as they consider
   as needed, without waiting for the CRISP Team and
 - don't want to appear as though we are not ready to listen to the
   ICG/the other two communities.

Theoretically, some part of our proposal may change - so requesting
after Phase II may be safe. If we can clearly explain that in case there
are any changes after Phase III, it could incorporated by RIRs, I am OK
with requesting RIR earlier as well.

I would also be interested to hear from the CRISP Team members joining
as RIR staff (and any other CRISP Team members who have opinions about
this ofcourse).


Izumi





More information about the CRISP mailing list