[CRISP-TEAM] Some Follow up Items

[Izumi Okutani]

Alan and CRISP Team,


On 2015/01/22 18:50, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> On 2015/01/21 17:59, Alan Barrett wrote:
>>> We have submitted the proposal to the ICG, but perhaps we should also 
>>> inform the RIRs that the proposal requires some action from them:
>>>
>>> * Draft a contract and SLA, with community consultation;
>>>
>>> * Establish a process for conducting reviews;
>>>
>>> * Establish a process for selecting the Review Committee.
>>>
>>
>> I see you have listed the points raised by Seun.
> 
> Yes, they seem to eb the same issues.
> 
>> So would the idea be that we inform RIRs to take a note and be 
>> prepared for the actions to be done before the transition?
>>
>> Then perhaps inform the IANAXFER that the CRISP Team's part of the 
>> consideration and action is done now hand over the RIRs for details on 
>> how they do this, including the timeline?
>>
>> Assuming this is assumption is correct, it makes sense to me personally.
> 
> Yes, I think that we should formally ask the RIRs to take over planning 
> the next steps, and inform the ianaxfer list.
> 

Just to clarify, based on information shared by Andrei, we inform the
IANAXFER list that we plan to do this in Step III (after Step II is
completed)?

 https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/iana-transition-assembly-finalization-24dec14-en.pdf

It may be premature to inform RIRs at this stage, as the ICG may make
some changes after integration of the proposal with those of the other
two communities (protocol parameter and names).


If this makes sense to everyone -

I would like to reply to Seun, after guidance from the NRO EC about the
CRISP Team's possible role in future steps, together with the above plan
we have, to hand over this part to RIRs after Step III.

I want to make sure we are all on the same page for future steps and our
role, so any other feedback on this continues to be welcome.



Izumi