[CRISP-TEAM] Some Follow up Items

[Andrei Robachevsky]

Hi Izumi,

Izumi Okutani wrote on 22/01/15 06:24:
> On 2015/01/21 17:59, Alan Barrett wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>>> There are a couple of work items I would like to follow up after the
>>> submission of our proposal to the ICG.
>>
>> I thought of more follow-up items.
>>
>> We have submitted the proposal to the ICG, but perhaps we should also 
>> inform the RIRs that the proposal requires some action from them:
>>
>> * Draft a contract and SLA, with community consultation;
>>
>> * Establish a process for conducting reviews;
>>
>> * Establish a process for selecting the Review Committee.
>>
> 
> I see you have listed the points raised by Seun.
> 
> So would the idea be that we inform RIRs to take a note and be prepared
> for the actions to be done before the transition?
> 
> Then perhaps inform the IANAXFER that the CRISP Team's part of the
> consideration and action is done now hand over the RIRs for details on
> how they do this, including the timeline?
> 
> Assuming this is assumption is correct, it makes sense to me personally.
> 


I was reading a very good blogpost from Alissa Cooper
(http://www.circleid.com/posts/20150120_iana_transition_planning_proceeding_in_fine_internet_style/),
where she reminded of the process phases
(https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/iana-transition-assembly-finalization-24dec14-en.pdf).

I am not sure we can take any further steps until the Phase I for our
proposal is over, specifically, when the ICG "publicly documents the
fact that the proposal is ready to move on to Step II".

>From the same document it seems we should get some clarity before 15
February.

Regards,

Andrei