[CRISP-TEAM] Comment from Richard Hill at "Icg-Forum at Icann.Org"

[Izumi Okutani]

Good point Andrei.

> My view is that there is a transition proposal and its implementation,
> which are not the same thing. The former documents the requirements and
> principles as set by the community, the latter - develops the details in
> accordance with the requirements (like the actual legal terms, etc.).

Strongly agree.
Thank you Alan for asking this good question.



(This may not be needed unless the ICG asks but I think it's still good
we share, in case of discussions come up during ICANN52 for example)


Izumi

On 2015/01/21 19:08, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I agree that we do not need to respond, unless the ICG requests comments
> from us.
> 
> Alan Barrett wrote on 21/01/15 09:39:
>> The process issues here are exactly the same:  did the CRISP charter or
>> the ICG RFP require us to specify more details than we actually
>> specified; and did the CRISP Team adequately consider Richard Hill's
>> position?
> 
> I do not think so. I think the boundary conditions were set by the NTIA
> criteria:
> - Support and enhance the multistakeholder model;
> - Maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet DNS;
> - Meet the needs and expectation of the global customers and partners of
> the IANA services; and,
> - Maintain the openness of the Internet.
> 
> Also regarding the overall process "Once a proposal is developed, ICANN
> will review the proposal to ensure it is in compliance with the defined
> framework and criteria and determine: 1) adherence to the NTIA
> principles and 2) conformity with the principles outlined by the
> community input."
> (https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/process-next-steps-2014-06-06-en).
> 
> All of the above suggest a rather high level of the expected input.
> 
> My view is that there is a transition proposal and its implementation,
> which are not the same thing. The former documents the requirements and
> principles as set by the community, the latter - develops the details in
> accordance with the requirements (like the actual legal terms, etc.).
> 
> Andrei
>