[CRISP-TEAM] Comment deadline UTC2030 e: Version 8 clean and redline
nurani at netnod.se
Thu Jan 15 21:43:54 CET 2015
On 15 jan 2015, at 21:41, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at netnod.se> wrote:
> On 15 jan 2015, at 21:39, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>>> On 2015/01/16 5:03, Alan Barrett wrote:
>>>> III.A.3. says "the NTIA has no oversight role in IANA Numbering
>>>> Services". Is that accurate? The previous vesion qualified it as no
>>>> oversight role "in policy-making", not no oversight role at all. I
>>>> don't know the answer.
>>> Alan, I had the same question and was wondering where this changes is
>>> coming from.
>>> It is talking about policy and I suggest bring the change back.
>> It's a substantive change that was not discussed. I think we should reinstate the "in policy making" phrase. The entire sentence would become:
>> The ASO MoU is an agreement between the Internet Number Community and ICANN; the NTIA has no oversight role in policy-making for IANA Numbering Services, and its transition out of its current role would have no effect on the policy-making framework.
> Yes you are right. It was a last-minute-fly-by-the-seat-of-your-pants-to-try-to-meet-a-crazy-deadline type of change. :-)
> Your suggestion is better! Let's stick to that.
I interpreted your comment being a response to my change. But I see it was a response to the text in the document.
In any case, I think your suggestion is better. :)
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
More information about the CRISP