[CRISP-TEAM] Comment deadline UTC2030 e: Version 8 clean and redline
apb at cequrux.com
Thu Jan 15 21:42:24 CET 2015
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>> On 2015/01/16 5:03, Alan Barrett wrote:
>>> III.A.3. says "the NTIA has no oversight role in IANA Numbering
>>> Services". Is that accurate? The previous vesion qualified it as no
>>> oversight role "in policy-making", not no oversight role at all. I
>>> don't know the answer.
>> Alan, I had the same question and was wondering where this changes is
>> coming from.
>> It is talking about policy and I suggest bring the change back.
> Saying "the NTIA's has no oversight role in IANA Numbering
> Services" is incorrect. So our review suggested removing it from
> there entirely:
> New text:
> "The ASO MoU is an agreement between the Internet Number
> Community and ICANN; the NTIA's transition out of its current
> role would have no effect on the policy-making framework."
> Does this make sense?
That's OK, but I prefer my text, which is closer to the original:
The ASO MoU is an agreement between the Internet Number
Community and ICANN; the NTIA has no oversight role in
policy-making for IANA Numbering Services, and its transition
out of its current role would have no effect on the
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the CRISP