[CRISP-TEAM] Comment deadline UTC2030 e: Version 8 clean and redline

Nurani Nimpuno nurani at netnod.se
Thu Jan 15 21:41:11 CET 2015

On 15 jan 2015, at 21:39, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> On 2015/01/16 5:03, Alan Barrett wrote:
>>> III.A.3.  says "the NTIA has no oversight role in IANA Numbering
>>> Services".  Is that accurate?  The previous vesion qualified it as no
>>> oversight role "in policy-making", not no oversight role at all.  I
>>> don't know the answer.
>> Alan, I had the same question and was wondering where this changes is
>> coming from.
>> It is talking about policy and I suggest bring the change back.
> It's a substantive change that was not discussed.  I think we should reinstate the "in policy making" phrase.  The entire sentence would become:
>   The ASO MoU is an agreement between the Internet Number Community    and ICANN; the NTIA has no oversight role in policy-making for    IANA Numbering Services, and its transition out of its current    role would have no effect on the policy-making framework.

Yes you are right. It was a last-minute-fly-by-the-seat-of-your-pants-to-try-to-meet-a-crazy-deadline type of change. :-)

Your suggestion is better! Let's stick to that.

> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp

More information about the CRISP mailing list