[CRISP-TEAM] Comment deadline UTC2030 e: Version 8 clean and redline
Izumi Okutani
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Thu Jan 15 21:39:49 CET 2015
On 2015/01/16 5:36, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>
> On 15 jan 2015, at 21:31, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>
>> On 2015/01/16 5:03, Alan Barrett wrote:
>>> III.A.3. says "the NTIA has no oversight role in IANA Numbering
>>> Services". Is that accurate? The previous vesion qualified it as no
>>> oversight role "in policy-making", not no oversight role at all. I
>>> don't know the answer.
>>
>> Alan, I had the same question and was wondering where this changes is
>> coming from.
>>
>> It is talking about policy and I suggest bring the change back.
>
> The version 8 by Bill said:
>
> "The ASO MoU is an agreement between the Internet Number Community and ICANN; the NTIA's has no oversight role in IANA Numbering Services, and its transition out of its current role would have no effect on the policy-making framework."
>
> But this is not correct. As Alan points out, there was something in there before about oversight role in "policy-making", which must have disappeared at some stage.
>
> Saying "the NTIA's has no oversight role in IANA Numbering Services" is incorrect. So our review suggested removing it from there entirely:
>
> New text:
> "The ASO MoU is an agreement between the Internet Number Community and ICANN; the NTIA's transition out of its current role would have no effect on the policy-making framework."
>
> Does this make sense?
> Nurani
yes. I saw that in your version and was about to post.
It works for me.
So Michael, you just need to reflect Nurani's word .
Izumi
More information about the CRISP
mailing list