[CRISP-TEAM] Comment deadline UTC2030 e: Version 8 clean and redline
nurani at netnod.se
Thu Jan 15 21:36:55 CET 2015
On 15 jan 2015, at 21:31, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> On 2015/01/16 5:03, Alan Barrett wrote:
>> III.A.3. says "the NTIA has no oversight role in IANA Numbering
>> Services". Is that accurate? The previous vesion qualified it as no
>> oversight role "in policy-making", not no oversight role at all. I
>> don't know the answer.
> Alan, I had the same question and was wondering where this changes is
> coming from.
> It is talking about policy and I suggest bring the change back.
The version 8 by Bill said:
"The ASO MoU is an agreement between the Internet Number Community and ICANN; the NTIA's has no oversight role in IANA Numbering Services, and its transition out of its current role would have no effect on the policy-making framework."
But this is not correct. As Alan points out, there was something in there before about oversight role in "policy-making", which must have disappeared at some stage.
Saying "the NTIA's has no oversight role in IANA Numbering Services" is incorrect. So our review suggested removing it from there entirely:
"The ASO MoU is an agreement between the Internet Number Community and ICANN; the NTIA's transition out of its current role would have no effect on the policy-making framework."
Does this make sense?
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
More information about the CRISP