[CRISP-TEAM] Status update
mabejuela at arin.net
Thu Jan 15 20:18:39 CET 2015
Thank you Bill for all the work on this. Freezing and finalizing, I will
wait for the Version 8 circulation and then happy to take the pen from
there and coordinate with you directly on any outstanding issues. I
anticipate any other comments or edits will be purely editorial (being
optimistic! :) ) but will wait and see for finalization.
Michael R. Abejuela
Associate General Counsel
3635 Concorde Parkway
Chantilly, VA 20151
(703) 227-9875 (p)
(703) 263-0111 (f)
mabejuela at arin.net
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, copy, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.
On 1/15/15, 2:04 PM, "Bill Woodcock" <woody at pch.net> wrote:
>> Are any of those issues still outstanding now?
>I wish the answer to that were clearer, but I think it¹s high time we
>closed version 8, so I¹m going to just be all optimistic and say ³yes."
>>> - The glossary is long, probably too long to go at the top of the
>>>document, and contains as-yet undefined items.
>> I think we agreed to omit anything that doesn't yet have a definition,
>>move it to an appendix, and add a note at the top telling people about
>>the appendix. I haven't seen a proposal for the exact text at the top..
>>> - The rampant variations of open/transparent/bottoms-up need to be
>> We agreed on "open, transparent, and bottom-up².
>>> - Whether or not to include the reference to Bermuda is (I think)
>>>waiting on a reply from Andrei.
>> I think he replied. Omit the reference to Bermuda or ICC rules in
>>> - The intellectual property issue is waiting on specific text, though
>>>everybody is expressing goodwill about it.
>> I sent a message with a copy of the agreed text.
>Andrei¹s was the last change (as I detailed in a separate email). Can
>you tell me whether you¹re okay with Andrei¹s text, or if you¹re
>proposing separate text that I should go looking through your mail for?
>>> - There was text about the RIRs serving the Internet Number Community
>>>that Paul and Nurani objected to but didn¹t suggest an alternative.
>> Nurani sent a copy of the agreed text.
>Yes, well, you all keep asserting agreement, and then sending me
>different things. I¹ve cobbled together a compromise between your
>various suggestions, with typo and punctuation correction, that¹s in
>there now, that I hope will prove sufficient.
>>> - There was a sentence about a third-party holder of IP that Paul
>>>wanted simplified, I proposed an alternative, haven¹t heard back from
>>>anyone. Haven¹t checked to see if it clobbers the other IP issue or
>> Nurani sent a copy of Paul's text. I replied to your suggestion.
>UhŠ Dammit. I updated it with the text you sent, "Future transitions
>will be smoother if intellectual property assets are held by an
>organization that is not the IANA Numbering Services Operator.² This was
>between you and Paul. I¹ll assume that what¹s there is good enough, and
>that Paul won¹t object too much if we move forward with it. Rather than
>trying to figure out which of Nurani¹s emails has that in it.
>> Dr. Govind¹s name
>>> - Alan suggested text ³elect individuals to the governing board² but
>>>didn¹t specify where it should go.
>> As I said last time you asked this, there's a sentence in II.B.3.ii
>>that says "members have the right to vote individuals onto the governing
>>board". I suggest to change that to "members have the right to elect
>>individuals to the governing board". Essentially "vote onto" -> "elect².
>Oh, right, sorry. Hadn¹t checked it off as completed.
>Okay. Thank you, Izumi, for freeing changes. I¹m going to take that as
>an absolute, and close version 8, and produce new clean and redlines now,
>and send them to the list. Expect them in a couple of minutes. Then
>I¹ll coordinate with Michael to pass the pen and whatever ambiguity
>remains in the above issues.
>I¹m just going to be optimistic again, and say that there are NO
>ADDITIONAL OUTSTANDING ISSUES that are not mentioned in this email. I
>hope you can all live with that.
More information about the CRISP