[CRISP-TEAM] Status update

[Bill Woodcock]

> On Jan 15, 2015, at 10:49 AM, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>>> On Jan 15, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>>> 
>>> It is expected that RIR staff, as the contractual party of this agreement, will draft the specific language of this agreement. During the drafting process, the RIRs are expected to consult their respective RIR communities.  and that tThe drafting process will be guided by the principles listed below. References to relevant sections of the current NTIA agreement are also noted, as it is expected the new agreement will share many of the same contractual goals and mechanisms.
>> 
> 
>> Okay, is there consensus on the text that Izumi is quoting here, modulo fixes to the typos?  It clobbers a whole lot of edits that various of you asked for.  Off the top of my head, I think the most popular one was the “expected that RIR staff, as the contractual party” being fixed to “expected that the RIRs, as the contractual parties”.  As written above, it’s obviously factually incorrect.
> 
> The first line should say "The RIRs".  Otherwise it looks OK.

Okay, applied with that caveat.

                                -Bill




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150115/2b34e6aa/signature.asc>