[CRISP-TEAM] Status update

[Alan Barrett]

On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> On Jan 15, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>>
>> It is expected that RIR staff, as the contractual party of 
>> this agreement, will draft the specific language of this 
>> agreement. During the drafting process, the RIRs are expected 
>> to consult their respective RIR communities.  and that tThe 
>> drafting process will be guided by the principles listed 
>> below. References to relevant sections of the current NTIA 
>> agreement are also noted, as it is expected the new agreement 
>> will share many of the same contractual goals and mechanisms.
>

> Okay, is there consensus on the text that Izumi is quoting here, 
> modulo fixes to the typos?  It clobbers a whole lot of edits 
> that various of you asked for.  Off the top of my head, I think 
> the most popular one was the “expected that RIR staff, as 
> the contractual party” being fixed to “expected that the 
> RIRs, as the contractual parties”.  As written above, it’s 
> obviously factually incorrect.

The first line should say "The RIRs".  Otherwise it looks OK.

--apb (Alan Barrett)