[CRISP-TEAM] Status update
apb at cequrux.com
Thu Jan 15 19:43:51 CET 2015
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> I’ve now completed all edits that I know of, that are
> applicable to version 7 of the document, and didn’t have
> outstanding issues.
> I’ve mailed the list about each of the outstanding issues,
Are any of those issues still outstanding now?
> - The glossary is long, probably too long to go at the top of
> the document, and contains as-yet undefined items.
I think we agreed to omit anything that doesn't yet have a
definition, move it to an appendix, and add a note at the top
telling people about the appendix. I haven't seen a proposal for
the exact text at the top..
> - The rampant variations of open/transparent/bottoms-up need to
> be harmonized.
We agreed on "open, transparent, and bottom-up".
> - Whether or not to include the reference to Bermuda is (I
> think) waiting on a reply from Andrei.
I think he replied. Omit the reference to Bermuda or ICC rules in
> - The intellectual property issue is waiting on specific text,
> though everybody is expressing goodwill about it.
I sent a message with a copy of the agreed text.
> - There was text about the RIRs serving the Internet Number
> Community that Paul and Nurani objected to but didn’t suggest
> an alternative.
Nurani sent a copy of the agreed text.
> - There was a sentence about a third-party holder of IP that
> Paul wanted simplified, I proposed an alternative, haven’t
> heard back from anyone. Haven’t checked to see if it clobbers
> the other IP issue or vice-versa yet.
Nurani sent a copy of Paul's text. I replied to your suggestion.
> - We’re waiting for Dr. Govind’s given name, if he has one.
Let's just use "Dr. Govind".
> - Alan suggested text “elect individuals to the governing
> board” but didn’t specify where it should go.
As I said last time you asked this, there's a sentence in
II.B.3.ii that says "members have the right to vote individuals
onto the governing board". I suggest to change that to "members
have the right to elect individuals to the governing board".
Essentially "vote onto" -> "elect".
> Up to the point at which I left the call, the consensus was to
> close all outstanding issues before moving to version 8, so we
> could call for consensus on version 8. I’m not getting a lot
> of feedback from you guys on the above.
I have seen rapid feedback on all issues you raised.
> 1) I can noodle around with the glossary until I see some
> consensus on the list.
> 2) We can just throw out all outstanding issues, declare it
> done, consensus reached, and move on to pagination.
> 3) I can wing it on the easy ones, throw out the hard ones, and
> freeze version 8.
> 4) You guys could get to work and close these issues, so I can
> apply them and freeze version 8.
> 5) We can change our minds about open issues from 7 passing on
> to 8, and I can punt all of the open issues on to Michael.
> 6) I could try to wing it on all of the open issues.
I think all the issues are resolved, modulo exact text for the
note referring people to the glossary appendix.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the CRISP