[CRISP-TEAM] Glossary of Definitions for RFP response

Alan Barrett apb at cequrux.com
Thu Jan 15 18:54:54 CET 2015

On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> Paul, thanks for taking the lead on the glossary.
> I’d originally had in mind something more like the paragraph 
> near the top of many legal documents, that defines all 
> neologistic terms and keywords, but this has grown to something 
> quite substantial, more than two pages already, and not all 
> terms have been defined yet… That’s seeming to me more 
> like an appendix than something we cram in right at the top.  
> Thoughts?

An appendix is fine, but then can we cram something in at the top 
to let people know that there's an appendix?

> Current version is appended, and I’d very much appreciate it 
> if people would contribute definitions for the as-yet-undefined 
> terms that people have asked be included.

I'll have a go, but I might not get them all.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

More information about the CRISP mailing list