[CRISP-TEAM] Interim version, not yet checked visually in Word...
apb at cequrux.com
Thu Jan 15 18:35:56 CET 2015
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> How about:
> “Having an organization that is not the IANA Numbering
> Services Operator hold title to intellectual property assets
> will make any future transitions smoother.”
> Would that address your concern, and keep everybody else happy?
I'd be happy with that, but I'd prefer to emphasise the smoothness
rather than the organization, like this:
Future transitions will be smoother if intellectual property
assets are held by an organization that is not the IANA
Numbering Services Operator.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the CRISP