[CRISP-TEAM] Interim version, not yet checked visually in Word...

[Alan Barrett]

On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> How about:
>
> “Having an organization that is not the IANA Numbering 
> Services Operator hold title to intellectual property assets 
> will make any future transitions smoother.”
>
> Would that address your concern, and keep everybody else happy?

I'd be happy with that, but I'd prefer to emphasise the smoothness 
rather than the organization, like this:

    Future transitions will be smoother if intellectual property
    assets are held by an organization that is not the IANA
    Numbering Services Operator.

--apb (Alan Barrett)