[CRISP-TEAM] Possible inconsinstency pointed out on IRP for Section III A2 and IIIA3

[Alan Barrett]

On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>>>>>>> remove any reference to rights being transferred to a
>>>>>>> successor organization.  All rights will be in the public domain, or
>>>>>>> transferred to a neutral organization like the IETF Trust, or
>>>>>>> transferred to the RIRs.  No rights will remain with the operator, so
>>>>>>> there will be no need to transfer any rights to a successor.
>
>>>> rights don't stay with the IANA operator
>
> Okay… Does anyone have a specific change that they’d like 
> applied to version 7, or shall I just wing it?

Andrei sent text that several people supported.

Email message:

    Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:22:01 +0100
    From: Andrei Robachevsky <robachevsky at isoc.org>
    To: Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com>
    CC: Craig Ng <craig at apnic.net>, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>,
            "crisp at nro.net" <crisp at nro.net>
    Subject: Re: [CRISP-TEAM] Possible inconsinstency pointed out on IRP for
            Section III A2 and IIIA3


NEW Text for section III.A.2:

    It is also the expectation of the Internet Number Community
    that non-public information related to the IANA number
    resource registries and corresponding services, including
    the provision of reverse DNS delegation in IN-ADDR.ARPA
    and IP6.ARPA, is managed by the IANA operator and will be
    transferred to its successor(s). All rights on non-public
    information related to the IANA number resource registries and
    corresponding services must be transferred to the RIRs.

NEW text for Section III.A.3:

    The contract will implement the RIR community expectations as
    described in section III.A.2

    Relevant section(s) in the NTIA contract: H.4, H.5


--apb (Alan Barrett)