[CRISP-TEAM] Exposed bottoms.

[Andrei Robachevsky]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I do not think the differences are substantial, so IMO it is not
important that we harmonize this. I suggest you leave them as they are.

Andrei

Bill Woodcock wrote on 15/01/15 17:56:
> You guys keep clobbering each other on these, and as a result,
> we’ve been ranging back and forth from two to nearly a dozen
> variants, currently six:
> 
>> bottom-up, open, and inclusive
>> 
>> active, bottom-up
>> 
>> to bottom-up, open, transparent, and consensus-based
>> 
>> openness, transparency, and bottom-up
>> 
>> open, transparent, and bottom-up
>> 
>> open, bottom-up and inclusive
> 
> Can you pick just one, let me harmonize them, and then stop
> clobbering each other on this particular issue?
> 
> -Bill
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ CRISP mailing list 
> CRISP at nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAlS39AsACgkQljz5tZmtij/U9wCgzilUd1AQPcy2sUvoVBOYRlbW
4qsAniSiFZXvSWiN2Gqwr849EVl4sXen
=z41e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----