[CRISP-TEAM] Alan Barrett's comments on the BW7 draft.

[Alan Barrett]

On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> Alan suggests re-inserting a section number 0 before “Proposal 
> type.”
>
> This is in conflict with the earlier edit to revert everything 
> from integer to wacky numbering.  Zero is an integer, not a 
> wacky number.  In wacky numbering, this is a Level 1 number, 
> which means it’s a roman numeral, and the roman numeral 
> equivalent of the integer 0 is Nulla, not 0.  Therefore, this 
> suggested edit is a no-op, because it would just be the fourth 
> go-round of a series of conflicting changes.

The section number 0 is for consistency with the ICG RFP.  We 
agreed on this in email.

The removal of the 0 is a change that you made without discussion.

--apb (Alan Barrett)