[CRISP-TEAM] Alan Barrett's comments on the BW7 draft.
apb at cequrux.com
Thu Jan 15 15:41:00 CET 2015
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> Alan suggests re-inserting a section number 0 before “Proposal
> This is in conflict with the earlier edit to revert everything
> from integer to wacky numbering. Zero is an integer, not a
> wacky number. In wacky numbering, this is a Level 1 number,
> which means it’s a roman numeral, and the roman numeral
> equivalent of the integer 0 is Nulla, not 0. Therefore, this
> suggested edit is a no-op, because it would just be the fourth
> go-round of a series of conflicting changes.
The section number 0 is for consistency with the ICG RFP. We
agreed on this in email.
The removal of the 0 is a change that you made without discussion.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the CRISP