[CRISP-TEAM] Alan Barrett's comments on the BW7 draft.
woody at pch.net
Thu Jan 15 15:37:29 CET 2015
> On Jan 15, 2015, at 3:51 AM, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
> <CRISP Team Proposal-BW7-apb-notes-4.doc>
So there are suggested edits that I won’t implement because they’re changing things that are the way they are for a reason, and so they’re just another step in a reversion war.
We no longer have time for me to comment on each one individually back to the list. I’m just going to illustrate a single one, so you can see what I’m talking about.
Alan suggests re-inserting a section number 0 before “Proposal type.”
This is in conflict with the earlier edit to revert everything from integer to wacky numbering. Zero is an integer, not a wacky number. In wacky numbering, this is a Level 1 number, which means it’s a roman numeral, and the roman numeral equivalent of the integer 0 is Nulla, not 0. Therefore, this suggested edit is a no-op, because it would just be the fourth go-round of a series of conflicting changes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the CRISP