[CRISP-TEAM] Interim version, not yet checked visually in Word...

Bill Woodcock woody at pch.net
Thu Jan 15 14:01:36 CET 2015

> On Jan 15, 2015, at 4:43 AM, Michael Abejuela <mabejuela at arin.net> wrote:
> Thank you Nurani for your comment and e-mail.
> Thank you also to Bill for the continuing work in the middle/end of the
> night,
> Just wanted to touch base real quick. Previously I had thought that we
> were holding off on any further changes to the draft until after the call
> so that the group had a baseline from which we would move forward and
> comment.

That would be a REALLY GOOD IDEA.  I hope that people can accommodate it sooner, rather than later.

> From your e-mails it appears you are well into working on a
> version 8.

8 is the set of applied changes that have been suggested since 7.  I need to start getting it to you, with the unapplied change list, if we’re changing pen now.  So, people, let’s stop talking about this, so I can do it.

> This is great to have the work started on the updated draft but
> just didn¹t want there to be confusion on (1) the draft from which the
> group is commenting and discussing on the call and (2) who is responsible
> for making the changes. At the very least I think we need to make sure all
> changes from Version 7 be done with track changes turned on

You appear to be making the same confusion between track changes and redlining, that Nurani and Izumi were.  Part of the bundle that I need to start preparing, is a redline between version 7 and version 8, so everyone doesn’t have to do that for themselves.  But again, I can be doing it, or I can be talking about it, and I’d prefer we stop talking about it so I can do it, if the consensus is that we’re shifting the pen again now.

> If you¹d like to focus on incorporating edits from the group into
> Version 8, I think that makes sense and is very much appreciatd before the
> next hand off back to me for finalization.

Okay, or I can do that.  Either way, just let me know one way or the other, for certain, so I know which direction to go.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150115/97019264/signature.asc>

More information about the CRISP mailing list