[CRISP-TEAM] Proceedings of discussions of the 14th call

[Michael Abejuela]

Bill,

My schedule for the rest of the time before submission of the proposal is
relatively wide open other than travel to/from the office. I have blocked
off much of today to ensure enough time to work on edits to the draft
proposal for finalization.

I agree that we should work off of your version 8 as I don¹t want to lose
any of your hard work on this. So I agree sharing such with the group
before the call makes sense and hand off can happen along with the list of
remaining items.

If anyone wishes to raise any issue, we can do so at the call. Hopefully
after the call, we will have clear direction and hopeful consensus on
this. As I recall from the charter of the CRISP team, we need to ensure we
record the agreement of the voting members (non-RIR staff members) of the
team on the proposal for submission to the ICG. So we need to build into
the timeline enough time for the finalization of the proposal and a
recorded vote to be had by the voting members prior to submission.

Thanks,
-Michael


-- 
Michael R. Abejuela
Associate General Counsel
ARIN
3635 Concorde Parkway
Suite 200
Chantilly, VA 20151
(703) 227-9875 (p)
(703) 263-0111 (f)
mabejuela at arin.net

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, copy, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.



On 1/15/15, 7:42 AM, "Bill Woodcock" <woody at pch.net> wrote:

>
>> On Jan 15, 2015, at 12:43 AM, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>> 
>> CRISP Team,
>> 
>> 
>> To make our call efficient, I would like to share how I plan to proceed
>> the discussions at the call today.
>> 
>> I would also like you to check version 7, see what comments of yours has
>> not been incorporated, so you can share them at the call (but *don't*
>> send them to the list now).
>> 
>> Please let me know if you have additional suggestions, especially
>> Michael, in making your work easier.
>> 
>> 
>> 1. We use Bill's ver.7 proposal at the meeting material
>
>I would prefer to use version 8, which incorporates everything applied
>since four hours ago.
>
>> [Bill: would you be able to also share redline version?]
>
>Yes, of course, but diff relative to what?
>
>> 2. Michael will share what comments he recognizes but have not yet been
>>  incorporated in ver. 7
>
>I would prefer that Michael and I arrive at a common list relative to
>version 8 and the beginning of the call, immediately before the call, or
>distribute version 8 before the call, and hand off Bill -> Michael with
>the list and version 9.
>
>>  - We confirm if this matches with CRISP Team members understanding
>> 
>>  e.g. we still have IRP discussions and Alan has shared updated
>>       version with his changes. Michael will clarify whether he
>>       acknowleges these inputs
>> 
>> 3. Confirm outstanding issues and CRISP Team position
>> 
>> 4. Confirm whether additional question/clarification is needed from
>>Michael
>
>All of that seems fine.  Michael, what does your schedule look like for
>the next 24 hours, and when would you like to hand the pen back and
>forth?  I¹ll be unavailable for the following periods:
>
>15:00 UTC / 07:00 PST / 10:00 EST through 17:00 UTC / 09:00 PST / 12:00
>EST
>18:00 UTC / 10:00 PST / 13:00 EST through 18:45 UTC / 10:45 PST / 13:45
>EST
>20:00 UTC / 12:00 PST / 15:00 EST through 21:00 UTC / 13:00 PST / 16:00
>EST
>00:00 UTC / 16:00 PST / 19:00 EST through 04:00 UTC / 20:00 PST / 23:00
>EST
>
>Šbut that latter is past our deadline, so I very much hope that we won¹t
>still be editing at that point.
>
>                                -Bill
>
>
>
>