[CRISP-TEAM] Proceedings of discussions of the 14th call

[Bill Woodcock]

> On Jan 15, 2015, at 12:53 AM, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> 1. We use Bill's ver.7 proposal at the meeting material
>> 
>> [Bill: would you be able to also share redline version?]
> 
> I believe that Bill has not been editing with the Change Tracking feature turned on.

I edit with it on, but when people say “with change tracking” that’s never actually what they mean, they mean redlines from whatever they think of as the previous version, which is essentially never what the changes are being tracked from.  Thus, as Alan is saying...

>  I believe that the redline versions Bill has sent have been created simply by comparing two versions of the document.  Anybody can do that for themselves.

Correct, and best.

> We also need to consider comments on the edits that Bill has made.

Yes, but at some point we need to stop arguing over things that we’ve already argued over.  There are no edits that are not the product of previous argument.

                                -Bill




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150115/bd54bbe7/signature.asc>