[CRISP-TEAM] Comments on section II
apb at cequrux.com
Thu Jan 15 11:36:13 CET 2015
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>Thank you for these comments Alan.
>I fully support all of them, except one (which is minor, really):
>> The NTIA IANA Agreement currently defines obligations of the
>> IANA Operator for Internet Number Resources.
> AB: Shoud be “IANA Numbering Services Operator” for
> My comment: In this case, I think it needs to say "of the IANA
> Operator for Internet Number Resources" as the NTIA agreement
> currently is with "the IANA Operator", not the “IANA Numbering
> Services Operator”.
I agree with Nurani that, in this sentence, we should use the
same phrase that the NTIA IANA contract uses. However, we will
then need to clarify that our phrase "IANA Numbering Services
Operator" means the same as the NTIA's phrase "IANA Operator for
Internet Number Resources". This is another thing to go into the
> I also note that you've pointed out a list of definitions we
> need to include. That's good and important! How do we best
> identify and incorporate these?
I'll suggest something in a reply to Paul Rendek.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the CRISP