[CRISP-TEAM] Comments on section II
nurani at netnod.se
Thu Jan 15 11:25:28 CET 2015
Thank you for these comments Alan.
I fully support all of them, except one (which is minor, really):
> The NTIA IANA Agreement currently defines obligations of the IANA Operator for Internet Number Resources.
AB: Shoud be “IANA Numbering Services Operator” for consistency
My comment: In this case, I think it needs to say "of the IANA Operator for Internet Number Resources" as the NTIA agreement currently is with "the IANA Operator", not the “IANA Numbering Services Operator”.
I also note that you've pointed out a list of definitions we need to include. That's good and important! How do we best identify and incorporate these?
On 15 jan 2015, at 09:28, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
> My earlier comments, in the file "CRISP Team Proposal-BW5-apb-notes-1.doc", were based on "CRISP Team Proposal-BW5.doc" and were my comments on section I of the document.
> I now attach the file "CRISP Team Proposal-BW7-apb-notes-2.doc", which are based on "CRISP Team Proposal-BW7.doc", and are my comments on section II of the document, plus a small number of comments on earlier sections.
> --apb (Alan Barrett)
> <CRISP Team Proposal-BW7-apb-notes-2.doc>_______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
More information about the CRISP