[CRISP-TEAM] Proceedings of discussions of the 14th call

[Nurani Nimpuno]

On 15 jan 2015, at 09:56, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

> On 2015/01/15 17:53, Alan Barrett wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>>> 1. We use Bill's ver.7 proposal at the meeting material
>>> 
>>> [Bill: would you be able to also share redline version?]
>> 
>> I believe that Bill has not been editing with the Change Tracking 
>> feature turned on.  I believe that the redline versions Bill has sent 
>> have been created simply by comparing two versionsof the document.  
>> Anybody can do that for themselves.
> 
> OK,noted  that is fine if it works for everyone.

I have attached a comparison between Bill's B7 and Michael's clean version.

A redline version would've been better of course as it is easier to track exactly what has changed. This is much harder. But if Bill hasn't used track changes during his editing, then there's no way of getting that back of course. So let's work with what we have. 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CRISP Team Proposal-BW7-compared-mraclean.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 156398 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150115/956b65a0/CRISPTeamProposal-BW7-compared-mraclean.docx>
-------------- next part --------------


Just a quick question about the process. 

Izumi, are you now asking us to hold any comments or changes we have for the teleconference? 

Could we make sure to list all changes/comments to be discussed in one place, so that we can avoid confusion and be more efficient at the teleconference? 

If we have issues, it would still be good if we can flag for them before the call (even if we don't have a long email discussion about it), so that we know what we need to discuss during the call.

Thanks,
Nurani



>>> 2. Michael will share what comments he recognizes but have not yet been
>>> incorporated in ver. 7
>>> 
>>> - We confirm if this matches with CRISP Team members understanding
>>> 
>>> e.g. we still have IRP discussions and Alan has shared updated
>>>      version with his changes. Michael will clarify whether he
>>>      acknowleges these inputs
>>> 
>>> 3. Confirm outstanding issues and CRISP Team position
>>> 
>>> 4. Confirm whether additional question/clarification is needed from 
>>> Michael
>> 
>> We also need to consider comments on the edits that Bill has made.
>> 
> 
> I thought this will be covered in step 2.
> We can confirm at the call if you mean something different Alan.
> 
> 
> Izumi
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp