[CRISP-TEAM] Possible inconsinstency pointed out on IRP for Section III A2 and IIIA3

[Paul Rendek]

Yes, thanks for this. I support this.

Paul


On 1/15/15 8:59 AM, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
> Thanks Andrei and Alan,
>
> This is consistent with my view as well. 
>
> I support Andrei's change. 
>
> Nurani
>
>
>> On 15 jan 2015, at 09:53, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015/01/15 17:48, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrei Robachevsky wrote on 15/01/15 09:43:
>>>>
>>>> Alan Barrett wrote on 15/01/15 09:32:
>>>> [...]
>>>>> So, you propose to remove any reference to rights being transferred to a
>>>>> successor organization.  All rights will be in the public domain, or
>>>>> transferred to a neutral organization like the IETF Trust, or
>>>>> transferred to the RIRs.  No rights will remain with the operator, so
>>>>> there will be no need to transfer any rights to a successor.
>>>> Yes, this is the point.
>>> Just to be clear - we proposed this all along, but I think we nailed
>>> down the root of the contradiction/inconsistency.
>> That is consistent with my undertanding as well, this had been our
>> position. (rights don't stay with the IANA operator)
>>
>> I will add this item in the angenda as one of the topics to reconfirm,
>> so everyone note about the text change (but no change in our position).
>>
>>
>> Izumi
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>