[CRISP-TEAM] Possible inconsinstency pointed out on IRP for Section III A2 and IIIA3

[Nurani Nimpuno]

Thanks Andrei and Alan,

This is consistent with my view as well. 

I support Andrei's change. 

Nurani


> On 15 jan 2015, at 09:53, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> 
>> On 2015/01/15 17:48, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Andrei Robachevsky wrote on 15/01/15 09:43:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Alan Barrett wrote on 15/01/15 09:32:
>>> [...]
>>>> So, you propose to remove any reference to rights being transferred to a
>>>> successor organization.  All rights will be in the public domain, or
>>>> transferred to a neutral organization like the IETF Trust, or
>>>> transferred to the RIRs.  No rights will remain with the operator, so
>>>> there will be no need to transfer any rights to a successor.
>>> 
>>> Yes, this is the point.
>> 
>> Just to be clear - we proposed this all along, but I think we nailed
>> down the root of the contradiction/inconsistency.
> 
> That is consistent with my undertanding as well, this had been our
> position. (rights don't stay with the IANA operator)
> 
> I will add this item in the angenda as one of the topics to reconfirm,
> so everyone note about the text change (but no change in our position).
> 
> 
> Izumi
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp