[CRISP-TEAM] Possible inconsinstency pointed out on IRP for Section III A2 and IIIA3

Izumi Okutani izumi at nic.ad.jp
Thu Jan 15 09:53:56 CET 2015

On 2015/01/15 17:48, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
> Andrei Robachevsky wrote on 15/01/15 09:43:
>> Alan Barrett wrote on 15/01/15 09:32:
>> [...]
>>> So, you propose to remove any reference to rights being transferred to a
>>> successor organization.  All rights will be in the public domain, or
>>> transferred to a neutral organization like the IETF Trust, or
>>> transferred to the RIRs.  No rights will remain with the operator, so
>>> there will be no need to transfer any rights to a successor.
>> Yes, this is the point.
> Just to be clear - we proposed this all along, but I think we nailed
> down the root of the contradiction/inconsistency.

That is consistent with my undertanding as well, this had been our
position. (rights don't stay with the IANA operator)

I will add this item in the angenda as one of the topics to reconfirm,
so everyone note about the text change (but no change in our position).


More information about the CRISP mailing list