[CRISP-TEAM] Interim version, not yet checked visually in Word...
Bill Woodcock
woody at pch.net
Thu Jan 15 07:55:05 CET 2015
> Contrary to what we discussed in the call yesterday, I now think that we should have a separate section of definitions.
Yes, that was what I’ve been advocating for for several days. If we can achieve consensus to do so, it would make me happy, and I think the document would become much more readable, since we could pull all the embedded definitions out of the middle of otherwise-more-readable sentences, throughout the document. However, drafting the paragraph is probably an hour, and finding and killing all the embedded definitions is probably a half-hour. They can be done in parallel, if the people doing them remain in tight communication.
-Bill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150114/10e54c73/signature.asc>
More information about the CRISP
mailing list