[CRISP-TEAM] Interim version, not yet checked visually in Word...
apb at cequrux.com
Thu Jan 15 07:53:52 CET 2015
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>> IV.A. Description of operational requirements ...
>> A new agreement specifying IANA operation of the Internet
>> Number Registries can be established well before the September
>> 2015 transition target, as we propose to simply reconcile the
>> contracting party with the policy authority, without changing
>> service levels or reporting.
> I believe that it should say that a new agreement "should" be
> established before the transition target. I realize this has
> implications, but I thought we had agreed on including language
> to the effect that this agreement should be in place before the
> transition. But we can discuss this.
There are two related concepts here. We think that it "should" be
done before the transition (it is a good idea), and we think that
it "can" be done (it is possible).
I don't have a preference for wording, but it would be nice if
both concepts could be conveyed.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the CRISP