[CRISP-TEAM] Interim version, not yet checked visually in Word...

[Alan Barrett]

On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>> IV.A.   Description of operational requirements ...
>> A new agreement specifying IANA operation of the Internet 
>> Number Registries can be established well before the September 
>> 2015 transition target, as we propose to simply reconcile the 
>> contracting party with the policy authority, without changing 
>> service levels or reporting.
>
> I believe that it should say that a new agreement "should" be 
> established before the transition target. I realize this has 
> implications, but I thought we had agreed on including language 
> to the effect that this agreement should be in place before the 
> transition. But we can discuss this.

There are two related concepts here.  We think that it "should" be 
done before the transition (it is a good idea), and we think that 
it "can" be done (it is possible).

I don't have a preference for wording, but it would be nice if 
both concepts could be conveyed.

--apb (Alan Barrett)