[CRISP-TEAM] Interim version, not yet checked visually in Word...

[Bill Woodcock]

> On Jan 14, 2015, at 10:01 PM, Andrei Robachevsky <robachevsky at isoc.org> wrote:
> 
> This proposal assumes that specific IANA customers (i.e., the numbers
> community, the protocol parameters community, and the names community)
> will have independent arrangements with the IANA Functions Operator
> related to maintenance of the specific registries for which they are
> responsible. At the same time, the Internet Number Community wishes to
> emphasize the importance of communication and coordination between these
> communities to ensure the stability of the IANA services. Such
> communication and coordination would be especially vital should the
> three communities reach different decisions regarding the identity of
> the IANA Functions Operator going forward. Efforts to facilitate this
> communication and coordination should be undertaken by the affected
> communities via processes distinct from this stewardship transition process.

Oop, sorry, just applied this in rev 7, along with the 2.1-to-II.B change.

I hadn’t yet finished checking for inch-marks and foot-marks, so I’ll go back to that now, while watching for any more proposed edits from the list.

                                -Bill




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150114/7f8c2424/signature.asc>