[CRISP-TEAM] Possible inconsinstency pointed out on IRP for Section III A2 and IIIA3
apb at cequrux.com
Wed Jan 14 18:18:20 CET 2015
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>Alan, I support the changes you propose (in the redline doc). I think it
>delineates different types of IPRs and their preferred owners clearly.
As I said, there are some unresolved issues:
>> * III.A.2 talks about IPR being transferred to a successor organization,
>> but III.A.3.ix does not.
>> * III.A.3.ix talks about IPR being transferred to the RIRs,
>> but III.A.2 does not.
>> It's not clear to me what we want here. We have several destinations
>> for IPR:
>> * Public domain;
>> * A neutral body such as the IETF Trust;
>> * The RIRs;
>> * The IANA Number Services Operator (to be transferred to a successor
>> What, if anything, should go to each destination?
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the CRISP