[CRISP-TEAM] Constistent use of term for number community

[Nurani Nimpuno]

Thanks Izumi. That is correctly understood.
Nurani

On 14 jan 2015, at 09:23, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

> Bill,
> 
> 
> My understanding of  Nurani's point is not suggesting to  replace RIR Community , just on the term which uses numbers commnutnites/community.
> 
> Nurani listed all point and if Michael feels it can be accomodated without too much problem then I think we can take this.
> 
> Does this reduce your concern?
> 
> Michael, please let us know if this causes issues for you in editing, to incorporate suggestion from Nurani, in that case we keep the current edit.
> 
> 
> 
> Izumii
> 
> On 2015/01/14 17:06, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> 
>>> On Jan 13, 2015, at 11:53 PM, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at netnod.se> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> We use a few different terms for the Internet number community in the document. In some places we use RIR community which is fine in my view. But where we talk about a number community, we should do so with a consistent term.
>> 
>> We put an awful lot of work into harmonizing on ���RIR community,��� which appears in 53 places.  The context of each instance has to be checked to make sure that it works, it���s not just a search-and-replace.  Time is getting mighty short for reversing fundamental edits.
>> 
>>                                 -Bill
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp