[CRISP-TEAM] Constistent use of term for number community
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Wed Jan 14 09:23:25 CET 2015
My understanding of Nurani's point is not suggesting to replace RIR
Community , just on the term which uses numbers commnutnites/community.
Nurani listed all point and if Michael feels it can be accomodated
without too much problem then I think we can take this.
Does this reduce your concern?
Michael, please let us know if this causes issues for you in editing, to
incorporate suggestion from Nurani, in that case we keep the current edit.
On 2015/01/14 17:06, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> On Jan 13, 2015, at 11:53 PM, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at netnod.se> wrote:
>> We use a few different terms for the Internet number community in the document. In some places we use RIR community which is fine in my view. But where we talk about a number community, we should do so with a consistent term.
> We put an awful lot of work into harmonizing on ���RIR community,��� which appears in 53 places. The context of each instance has to be checked to make sure that it works, it���s not just a search-and-replace. Time is getting mighty short for reversing fundamental edits.
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
More information about the CRISP