[CRISP-TEAM] Constistent use of term for number community

[Izumi Okutani]

Thanks Nurani. I agree with your suggestion.
I think it also covers Bill's point as well about keeping it singular.

Thank you to have listed  all relevant parts with suggested
replacements. Helpful in review .

On III.A.3, the replacement suggestion says "numbers community" and not
"Internet number community"- just want to check if there is a reason for
this or simply an overlook.


I'd like to also confirm with CRISP team whether we us singular/plural
for "numbers".

Plural makes sense to me personally as we are handling IP address (IPv4
and Ipv6) and ASNs but I don't feel strong about it. If there is
alreading existing use by RIRs/NRO we can perhasp folow that.


Izumi


On 2015/01/14 16:53, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We use a few different terms for the Internet number community in the document. In some places we use RIR community which is fine in my view. But where we talk about a number community, we should do so with a consistent term.
> 
> I suggest we use "Internet number community" consistently.
> Please find my list below of language that would be good to make consistent.
> 
> Nurani
> 
>> I.A.
>> The IANA activities relevant to the number resource communities are
> 
> -> The IANA activities relevant to the Internet number resource communities are
> 
>> III.A.
>> This proposal assumes that specific IANA customers (i.e. the numbers community,
> 
> -> This proposal assumes that specific IANA customers (i.e. the Internet numbers community,
> 
>> III.A.1.
>> ... the Internet numbering community believes that ICANN should remain ...
> 
> -> ... the Internet numbers community believes that ICANN should remain ...
> 
>> III.A.3
>> The Internet numbering community proposes that a new contract be established
> 
> -> The Internet numbers community proposes that a new contract be established
> 
>> III.A.3
>> ... IANA functions operator's accountability to the open, bottom-up numbers community.
> 
> 
> -> ... IANA functions operator's accountability to the open, bottom-up numbers community.
> 
>> VI.A.
>> The number resources communities based their process for developing an IANA stewardship
> 
> -> The Internet numbers community based its process for developing an IANA stewardship
> 
>> VI.A.
>> only the positive commitment of the numbering community to this process
> 
> 
> -> only the positive commitment of the Internet numbers community to this process
> 
>> VI.G.
>> Team to develop a single Internet numbering community proposal
> 
> -> Team to develop a single Internet numbers community proposal
> 
>> VI.I.
>> The CRISP Team believes therefore that the current proposal fully reflects the consensus of the global numbering community.
> 
> -> The CRISP Team believes therefore that the current proposal fully reflects the consensus of the global Internet numbers community.
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>