[CRISP-TEAM] IV.A "no changes" is inaccurate
apb at cequrux.com
Wed Jan 14 08:20:38 CET 2015
Section IV.A says:
The shift from the existing contractual arrangement to another
contractual arrangement (perhaps relying on a set of distinct
contracts) covering the IANA functions operator’s ongoing
management of all the IANA functions should result in no
operational change for management of the global Internet
number resource pools. This will help minimize any operational
or continuity risks associated with stewardship transition.
The necessary agreement proposed for IANA Numbering Services
Operator for the IANA Number Registries can be established
well before the NTIA target date for transition (September
2015), as there are no changes to existing service levels
or reporting that are being proposed, only a change in
contracting party to align with the delegated policy
I think that the "no operational change" in the first paragraph
quoted above is accurate, but the "no changes" in the second
quoted paragraph (the last paragraph of the section) is
I think that there will be changes to the service level agreement
as we move from an SLA with the NTIA, to an SLA with the RIRs; and
there will be changes to reporting as we move from reporting to
the NTIA, to reporting to the RIRs.
I propose to say "no significant changes" instead of "no changes"
in the last paragraph.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the CRISP